Manuel Hendel proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>> mutt -f '{imap.server}folder-name'
>
>I thought that just the 1.2 version got the imap part. What's abaut
>the performance, does it work fine?
>
I was checking imap folders on a .95.4i - it was pretty ok ... except that
m$ sexchange has a badly broken version of what it calls "imap" ;)
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.com
Green light in a.m. for new projects. Red light in P.M. for traffic
tickets.
- Re: Mutt and IMAP Brendan Cully
- Re: Mutt and IMAP Chris Green
- mutt and imap Manuel Hendel
- Re: mutt and imap Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt and imap Chris Green
- Re: mutt and imap Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt and imap Chris Green
- Re: mutt and imap Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt and imap Thomas Roessler
- Re: mutt and imap Manuel Hendel
- mutt and IMAP Suresh Ramasubramanian
- mutt and IMAP Dan Boger
- Re: mutt and IMAP Kai Blin
- Re: mutt and IMAP Dan Boger
- Re: mutt and IMAP Kai Blin
- Mutt and IMAP Rapha�l HALIMI
- Re: Mutt and IMAP Brendan Cully
- Re: Mutt and IMAP Rapha�l HALIMI
