Hello Mutt Users! On pon 07 sie 2000 13:21:59 GMT David T-G wrote: > That's what I thought you said. Interesting. Maybe this will interest you. I think the recipe in the PGP-Notes is wrong. Let's say someone sends me a message with an enclusore. He is also using PGP and signs the message. There is a Content-Type: multipart/. header in his mail. Because of it the recipe doesn't match the mail. I think that "* !^Content-Type: multipart/" should be scratched. -- Tomasz Olszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- PGP6 & The Bat Caster
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat David T-G
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Caster
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat David T-G
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Caster
- Re[2]: PGP6 & The Bat Gary
- Re: Re[2]: PGP6 & The Bat David T-G
- Re: Re[2]: PGP6 & The Bat David T-G
- Re: Re[2]: PGP6 & The Ba... David T-G
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Thomas Roessler
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Caster
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Aaron Schrab
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Caster
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Aaron Schrab
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat David T-G
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat David T-G
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Thomas Roessler
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Caster
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Thomas Roessler
- Re: PGP6 & The Bat Caster