[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> For other users in my position, namely with a machine without a hostname and/or
> externally visible IP, my advice is to stay clear of sendmail/qmail and try ssmtp.
There's no hassle with running sendmail / qmail / postfix though - it gets to
be a bit more interesting than just ssmtp :)
-s
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
- using non-local smtp server? Jeff Turner
- Re: using non-local smtp server? Rich Lafferty
- Re: using non-local smtp server? Timothy Legant
- Re: using non-local smtp server? Timothy Legant
- Re: using non-local smtp server? Jeff Turner
- Re: using non-local smtp server? Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: using non-local smtp server? jeff
- Re: using non-local smtp serv... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: using non-local smtp serv... Conor Daly
- Re: using non-local smtp ... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: using non-local smtp ... Dave Murray
- Re: using non-local s... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: using non-local s... Dave Murray
- Re: using non-local smtp server? Dave Murray
- Re: using non-local smtp server? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: using non-local smtp server? teo
- Re: using non-local smtp server? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: using non-local smtp server? teo
