On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
> > I am searching for a way defining a default TO: address depending on
> list-reply (default: L)
....
> Reply to the current or tagged message(s) by extracting any addresses
> which match the addresses given by the ``lists or subscribe''
> commands, but also honor any Mail-Followup-To header(s) if the
> ``$honor_followup_to'' configuration variable is set. Using this when
> replying to messages posted to mailing lists helps avoid duplicate
> copies being sent to the author of the message you are replying to.
Is this true solution? I do concur the use of "lists or subscribe" is
a good thing if used appropriately. But blanket statement makes me
worry. This makes new message linked to previous message which we
sometines do not want when one wish to initiate a thread. This is valid
only for continuing discussion. (I see so many careless posting attached
to unrelated thread.)
L : continue discussion on list (Good thing with "lists")
m : start thread.
g : reply to all
So also redefining "m" with each folder is a good idea which someone
else already posed if "m" to work as original poster intended. (I
should try...)
One reminder, when you do not want reply to be addressed to you but
should go to ML, set "subscribe". Then also change .muttrc
#index format (Collasped)
set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15F %?M?(#%03M)&(%4l)? %s"
to get address displayed sanely. This one took me a while before I
figured out
Osamu
--
~~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~
+ Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D +
+ My debian quick-reference, http://www.aokiconsulting.com/quick/ +
