Jeremy, et al -- ...and then Jeremy Blosser said... % % On Jan 08, Vincent Lefevre [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: % > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:16:58 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: % > > Why not just 'unset pgp_verify_sig'? That's what I do. % > % > But is there an option to ask Mutt not to display garbage like % > % > [-- La sortie PGP suit (heure courante : Tue Jan 8 00:13:02 2002) --] % > gpg: Avertissement: l'utilisation de la m?moire n'est pas s?re ! ... % > [-- Fin des donn?es sign?es --] % > % > ? % > % > The "s" in the index is sufficient for me if I want to know if a % > message is signed. % % I do believe there are some patches out there to limit what is shown; I'm % not sure what exactly they do.
There was a condense_pgp patch from Sec Zehl back in the 0.95 days, but it no longer applies and it's quite unsupported. I haven't seen anything else like it... I agree that it would be nice to completely suppress any notion of the pgp-ness of a message, even though I wouldn't want to do so. Meanwhile, your macro idea looks interesting and I look forward to how it turns out. :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg22655/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
