On Jan 15, Maciej Kalisiak [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:23:34PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > > On Jan 15, Maciej Kalisiak [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > > Is it possible in mutt to change the parent of a message in a thread? > > > And then have it be written to the mailbox so that the message keeps the > > > new parent in subsequent "mutt" invocations? > > > > Cedric Duval has a patch to do this, see: <http://cedricduval.free.fr/mutt/> > > Oh! I find that "&" seems to be part of the vanilla distribution of > mutt (i.e., its in my help menu, and it works), at least in 1.3.25. > Excellent. Or is that patch you mention somehow different?
Er, no, it is not included in vanilla mutt. Your mutt must not be quite as vanilla as you think. ;) > Anyhow, there seems to be a glaring but minor bug with the built-in > version: when I re-parent some threads, exit mutt, and go back to same > folder (i.e., the changes are written out to the mailbox and reread from > scratch), the re-parented messages are now flagged "N". This prompted me > to look at the headers of these messages. What seems to happen is that > when the "In-Reply-To:" field is added, it does not bear a newline at > the end; this causes the "Status:" field to become merely a continuation > of the "In-Reply-To:" line, losing its significance. Well, since we're uncertain where you're really getting that functionality from, it's hard to say. Does your mutt -v output list any patches?
msg23145/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
