Adam -- ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... % % On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 03:36:52PM -0500, David T-G wrote: % > I don't know about the macro you found, but it seems that either a toggle % > macro (the same keystroke(s) to turn things on and off) or a macro that % % it looks like this (a bit clumsy imho): % % macro pager V "<enter-command>set pgp_verify_sig\n<exit><display-message><check-traditional-pgp><enter-command>unset pgp_verify_sig\n" "Check PGP sig"
That's interesting... What gives with the check-trad bit, I wonder, since it's *after* one displays the message. I think that that can go. Yes, that looks a bit clumsy. If I were to do it (and keep Ctrl-U as a binding), I'd probably do something like macro index ,@veron "<enter-command>set pgp_verify_sig\n;macro index \\cu ,@veroff 'Toggle PGP verification'\n" macro index ,@veroff "<enter-command>unset pgp_verify_sig\n;macro index \\cu ,@veron 'Toggle PGP verification'\n" macro index \cu ,@veron 'Toggle PGP verification' (though that's untested). % % > runs the verify command (too lazy to look it up now :-) would do you well % % is there any mutt function to verify sig of current message? i don't % mean sending it through pipe to gpg, but verifing it internaly in mutt. Well, it looks like that's all that mutt does (see $pgp_verify_command in your gpg.rc), so I doubt that there's another way. Hmmm... I take that back; it's tougher than that, since mutt separates the two pieces and then hands them to gpg as %s and %f... Good luck :-) % % % -- % % _.|._ |_ _. | Adam Byrtek, [EMAIL PROTECTED] % (_|||_)| |(_| | gg 1802819 % | HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg23654/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
