On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 09:35:29AM -0500, "N. Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 06:01:28AM -0600, John Buttery wrote: > >> That being said, in practice it is probably a good bet 9 times out of >> 10 that if you see a date like xxxx-xx-xx it is probaby YYYY-MM-DD... > >Interesting... In what situation would XXXX-XX-XX ever be confused with >YYYY-DD-MM instead of YYYY-MM-DD?
Like I said, if the person didn't know you were using ISO format: 2002-01-02 If we know this is ISO, then obviously it's "January 2, 2002". But if we're not _sure_ it's ISO, then it could be "February 1, 2002". Please reply to either the list or me personally, not both (preferably to the list unless it's a personal matter). Not a flame, just a reminder. :) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
msg25422/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature