On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, 15:05, Gary Johnson wrote: > > 2002-01-02 > > > > If we know this is ISO, then obviously it's "January 2, 2002". But if > > we're not _sure_ it's ISO, then it could be "February 1, 2002".
> Nah. Not even someone who had never even _heard_ of ISO would ever > write YYYY-DD-MM. For one thing, only an analytic would put the year > first, and an analytic would follow that by the month, then the day. It makes me wonder why America uses MM/DD/YYYY then? It's the same thing :) In log files I prefer YYYY-MM-DD and in general DD-MM-YYY works fine.. Just my EUR0,02... (not EUR0.02 ;-) Ray --
