Re: Replacing a message with its filtered output

[Steve Talley]

This is cool!  Thanks Mike!

One suggestion I could see for improvement would be to prompt for a
filter program (instead of an alternate editor) and then replace the
message with the STDOUT of the filter.  That way simple things like:

    sed 's/\<re:/Re:/i'

or

    grep -v '^X-Priority'

would work.

The prompt for <filter-message> would be something like

    Filter command:

Anyone (dis)agree?

Thanks,

Steve

Mike Schiraldi wrote:

> Here's the patch. I wrote it, i'll let you test it.
>
> Don't forget to "sleep 1" or else mutt will assume your script
> didn't do anything.