* Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> X-Mailer is now deprecated in favor of User-Agent.
> Thus, Mutt weeds any x-mailer fields it finds in the
> header and replaces it with its own User-Agent field.

* David Collantes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-29 19:38]:
> I still do not understand. If I am given the choice to
> set any header I want on Mutt, why should the header
> be weed?  I am already telling Mutt to set the
> User-Agent, but what if I want X-Mailer too? What if
> I use X-Mailer for something else?  Shouldn't it be
> left alone? Please correct if I am wrong and explain.

What use is the identification of the user
agent when everyone can set what he wants?

  "you sent your mail with 'cat'? kewl!"  not!

Sven  [and *dont* touch indent_prefix or sigdashes!]

-- 
Intolerant people should be shot.

Reply via email to