* Derek Martin <inva...@pizzashack.org> [07-27-10 18:43]:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:50:17PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
> 
> It does.  And I believe it's not a lone.  But Exim does not by
> default, and ssmtp may not as well (but it probably should).  Exim
> claims to have good reason for leaving them, but I've read the
> arguments and I find them dubious, at best.
> 

Then the *problem* is with exim rather than the *expected* actions of
mutt's config?


-- 
Patrick Shanahan         Plainfield, Indiana, USA        HOG # US1244711
http://wahoo.no-ip.org     Photo Album:  http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535                    @ http://counter.li.org

Reply via email to