* Christoph Kukulies <k...@kukulies.org> [07-29-10 03:36]: > Oh, sorry. I thought in the first place (as some other reader as well > ) your post was meant sarcastically. :) > So it's probably not a good idea to use this Bcc:- technique? > > Then I'm probably left to the loop technique sending a single email to > each user. Otherwise that user doesn't know that the email went to a > "list of undisclosed recipients". > > I sometimes receive such emails that are marked as "undisclosed > recipients" in the Cc:. > > Could that possibly achieved by mutt forging the headers (in a benign > way of course). Sending to a list of > 100 users must not be ncessarily called "spam".
If you put an address in the "To:" field, there will be an address there. What I do when sending to a list and bcc'ing the addressees: To: Westside Soccer Fans <westsid...@wahoo.no-ip.org> Bcc: WestsideSoccerFans.alias The "To:" address is an alias to my local box and appears in all of the list mail. The list then understands that it is not spam for them. I have bcc'ed this post to you so you can see the mutt-users address. Note the "To:" header/address. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org
