* Derek Martin <inva...@pizzashack.org> [2013-02-02 11:44 -0600]: [save-message] > Now, I will grant you, this feature is a bit schizophrenic. It also > assumes that once it has done whatever it's going to do, that you no > longer want the existing copy of the message, and marks it for > deletion. At which point I have to go and undelete it, which I've > always found annoying. Because when I use this feature, I do in fact > want a separate copy of the message. Pretty much always. I suspect > that it behaves this way because ME (I'm assuming) decided that the > two operations, moving a message to another folder, and saving a > message to a file, were functionally equivalent, and therefore elected > for the economy of only implementing one. Trouble is, in neither case > does it really do what the user wants it to do, IMO. What the user > really wants, I believe, are the three behaviors I described above.
There is <copy-message> (bound to C by default). Nicolas -- http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
