Hello, I don't understand why be jealous on something that has been clearly worked out in the licence itself.
I don't know who is that man, but speak to him. Don't blame people for doing something that was intended to do in the first place. It was intention that everyone can make a fork and do what they want. So don't stamp on the freedom of software and GNU GPL, as there is just nothing written about the "Community" in the licence. Not even the word "community" is there. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:13:52PM -0800, David Champion wrote: > * On 29 Jan 2016, mutt-us...@rcdrun.com wrote: > > > > So, whoever is producing the fork, DOES work with the community within > > the scope of the GNU GPL. > > Working within a development community and keeping the terms of a > license are disjoint. Doing one gains you no ground on the other. > mutt-kz keeps the license. It does not work with the greater mutt > community. > > -- > David Champion • d...@bikeshed.us
