PS. Re Point 8... Is there any hotkey way to give focus to the Importance 
and/or Urgency sliders on a task?
This is an IMPORTANT requirement for me... !  

J


On Friday, November 28, 2014 10:26:06 PM UTC, Dwight Arthur wrote:
>
> Hi, John. My answers are a little different from Joel's. 
>
> Just to get it out of the way, I will start with #12. I'd like to break it 
> into three parts: Listening to users and being guided by user requests, 
> quick turnaround on requested enhancements, and communicating plans and 
> status back to users.
>
> In my opinion (others may disagree) a substantial amount of the 
> development of MLO since I got involved with it a few years ago has been 
> based on, and guided by user requests. There are some long-standing 
> requests that have not been addressed but I do believe that the development 
> team deserves credit for giving serious consideration to user requests.
>
> MLO seems to have a longer development cycle than many other apps. I won't 
> speculate as to why, but I will say that it's not uncommon for the time 
> between releases to be quite long, and for users to become quite impatient 
> with the wait for features that have been promised but not yet delivered. I 
> don't view this as unresponsiveness, it's a different issue.
>
> Finally, MLO developers are not good at keeping users posted about what's 
> on the way and when to expect it. We have seen several attempts to make 
> this better but as of today the problem remains.
>
> Moving on to your other items
>
> 1. It would help to know what mobile platform you intend to use. On 
> Windows the Rapid Task Entry (RTE) window is fairly effective. Unlike Joel 
> I find the Add-Task widget on Android to be more effective than RTE. I can 
> open a new task in one to two taps, type the task name and then save it in 
> one tap. If I want to set priorities, categories, schedules etc one more 
> tap brings up the full task properties menu. I don't know anything about 
> what happens on Apple, though.
>
> 2. Subprojects and subtasks are solid features.
>
> 3. You can toggle project status with a single click or the hotkey 
> Ctrl-Shift-P. Note that you can find lots of hotkeys (and redefine them if 
> you like) in tools>options>general>hotkeys. There are also a number of 
> users who exchange scripts for MLO under AHK (AutoHotKey) in this forum.
>
> 4. The built-in Next Actions view should provide what you want.
>
> 5. if you sign up for cloud sync (an extra-cost service) you will be able 
> to set up an email address for your tasks at the cloud server. Any email 
> you forward to this address will be added to the cloud copy of your tasks. 
> The next time you sync, the task will appear in your task list. There is a 
> scheme for encoding parameters like context, importance, etc into the name 
> of the task when using RTE; if you turn on the Parse option RTE will decode 
> the parameters and apply them to the task. (the parsing syntax is a little 
> obscure especially with respect to dates but once you get the hang of it, 
> it works well.) There's no parsing in the email to cloud service, but once 
> the task is in your profile you can select it an hot some hotkey (I don't 
> use this so I'm not sure of the hotkey, maybe it's alt-enter?) and MLO will 
> parse and apply the parameters at that time.
>
> 6. You can set importance and urgency separately. There's also something 
> called computed-score which takes importance, urgency, schedule issues, the 
> tasks' parents and other stuff and creates an overall priority. Computed 
> score is written up in the User Guide - I don't use it because it's too 
> complex, but some people really like it. You can use autoformat rules to do 
> the highlighting and formatting that you seek. It involves creating rules 
> like "if importance is greater than 100 and less than 150 and task is not 
> completed then font color is orange." There's a bit of a learning curve to 
> this stuff but it's worth it because it's very powerful.
>
> 7. In MLO there are often many ways to do one thing and you should chose 
> the one that's easiest and most effective for you. (Which might be 
> different from the one that's easiest and most effective for me). I would 
> use the "star" which can be turned on with a single click or by hitting 
> ctrl-shift-s. Other people might define a flag called "inFocus" and 
> associate an appropriate icon.
>
> 8.OK, it's time to talk about position-in-outline versus 
> position-in-report. Every task has a position somewhere in the outline, 
> alongside of its siblings, above any subtasks, subfolders or sub-folders 
> (collectively "children") and (unless it's at the root) its parent and 
> grandparent etc items (each of which can be a task, folder or project). 
> Position in the outline is helpful for finding a task and it matters for 
> "complete tasks in order" and has a big effect on the calculation of 
> computer-score. But position in the outline is not necessarily related at 
> all to what tasks to do next. A view showing all tasks in their 
> hierarchical structure is an outline view, a view showing a selected subset 
> (eg tasks in a certain context) in their hierarchical structure is a 
> filtered outline. People often find it helpful to work in the outline when 
> analysing and designing their projects. When actually getting things done, 
> many people prefer to work in a to-do list, which is a flat (no hierarchy) 
> filtered and sorted view of things to be done. Sometimes there is a 
> legitimate need to move a task around in the outline, but usually when 
> people ask about this, they are wanting to move a task up or down in a 
> sorted list. Again, there are a lot of methods - my favorite is to sort the 
> list by importance then, click on the importance slider and hold down the 
> left arrow or the right arrow on the keyboard. The slider starts to move 
> and the importance numbers start to climb or dive. At the same time, the 
> task jumps up or down the listing as its position in the sort order 
> changes. When the task has landed where I want it, I let go of the arrow.
>
> 9. You must be familiar with the PC application program by now. There's no 
> web program at this point.
>
> 10. mobile and desktop apps can sync by either wifi or cloud sync 
> facilities. Wifi syncs between two devices on the same IP subnet. If your 
> mobile device is out of range of the wifi then sync will have to wait till 
> it's back in range. If there are more than two devices (eg a desktop, phone 
> and tablet) you have to set up sync between two of them (say, the desktop 
> and phone) and then exclude the phone and reconfigure the desktop to sync 
> with the tablet. It's free and the data never leaves your subnet so 
> security is less of an issue. With cloud sync, each device syncs separately 
> with a cloud server. There is a monthly charge for the service. You can 
> sync any device whenever you want. Conflict resolution is nicely 
> implemented on windows-to-cloud syncs but is a bit more primitive on the 
> Android side. You can have lots of devices syncing (and sharing) the same 
> task list. You can email a task to the cloud server and it will show up on 
> all of your devices. Security entails the use of standard SSL for 
> communications to and from the cloud server. Databases on Android and 
> Windows are encrypted only if the user has set up some sort of encrypted 
> volume using OS utilities, MLO remains unaware of any such protections. At 
> this point there does not seem to be any way to cause the cloud database to 
> be encrypted. The cloud service is apparently hosted at Amazon, which has 
> better than average security as compared to other unencrypted cloud 
> databases. This was clearly an acceptable level of security for nearly 
> everyone when the cloud sync was implemented but the number of people 
> seeking improvements such as encryption of cloud data are increasing.
>
> 11. security was discussed in item 10 above
>
> 12 dealt with at the top. As others have noted, communication is somewhat 
> better with those who apply for and are accepted into the beta program, 
> which entails committing to spend some serious time testing beta versions 
> of MLO. Full disclosure: I'm a moderator in the Android and Windows beta 
> teams.
>
> Best of luck to you.
> Dwight
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/dc57e8ed-ecfb-4962-a2c8-ac0d4a3429eb%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to