On 7 March 2011 18:45, Andrew Chadwick (email lists) <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/03/11 17:20, Jon Nordby wrote: > >> I agree. However, point 1. should be GPLv2+ / LGPLv2+ (that is, the >> license must have the " or (at your option) any later version." clause >> intact). > > Okay. Our LGPL version from brushlib/copying is v2.1, so what about the > following for answer point 1? > > ---------------------8<---------------------- > 1. All program code and supplemental data files should be licensed under > the GNU GPLv2, or the LGPLv2.1. Keep the "or (at your option) any later > version" clause intact, please! This includes program icons and artwork > for display within the program. > --------------------->8---------------------- > I'd make it a bit more strict and say: 1. All program code and supplemental data files should be licensed under the GNU GPLv2, or the LGPLv2.1 with the "or (at your option) any later version" clause intact.
I think you can reverse the order of the points. It is pretty much standard to contribute code under the same license as the existing code, but the requirements for brushes and similar might be more unexpected and thus warrant a spot higher up. -- Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com _______________________________________________ Mypaint-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/mypaint-discuss
