Thanks for the reply Brad, in that case I think I will stick with mysql as it seems more people use mysql in the cold fusion community at present, cheers
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brad Tilley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "EWAGW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:45 PM Subject: Re: Difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL > EWAGW wrote: > > Hi all, mr.super newbie here, what is the best for cold fusion development? > > I know that NASA uses MySQL but I have also been told that more > > 'professionals'(???) use PostgreSQL. Let the flaming begin!! > > No need for flames. I think the two are converging. > > PostgreSQL started out with a focus on being full-featured and as > powerful as Oracle. MySQL started out with a focus on being fast and > small. Today, PostgreSQL is as full-featured as ever, and guess what... > it's becoming faster too. MySQL is still fast, but it's adding more and > more features. They are approaching the asme point... they just started > on different ends of the spectrum. Five years from now, IMO, there'll be > little if any difference. > > > > > -- > MySQL General Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
