That's not a description of 'load balancing'; it is a high availability solution you're looking for.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Joey L <mjh2...@gmail.com> wrote: > I understand ..I am looking for load balancing - something that i do > not have to worry about if one server goes down - the other server > will be up and running by itself and i can bring back the other server > later on when i have time. > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ananda Kumar <anan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > when u say redudency. > > Do u just want replication like master-slave, which will be > active-passive > > or > > Master-master which be active-active. > > > > master-slave, will work just a DR, when ur current master fails you can > > failover the slave, with NO LOAD balancing. > > > > Master-master allows load balancing. > > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Joey L <mjh2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I am running a site with about 50gig myisam databases which are the > >> backend to different websites. > >> I can not afford any downtime and the data is realtime. > >> > >> What is the best method for this setup? master-master or master-slave? > >> > >> What are the best utilities to create and maintain this setup? as far > >> as load balancing between the two physical servers that i am running. > >> I am currently working with percona utilities - is there something > better > >> ? > >> what would you use to load balance mysql ? what would you use to load > >> balance apache. > >> > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> -- > >> MySQL General Mailing List > >> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > >> To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > >> > > > > -- > MySQL General Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > >
