Am 19.03.2016 um 15:08 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
Ok. I tried again:

pc53200:~ # nslookup 20.103.107.146.score.senderscore.com.
Server:         146.107.8.88
Address:        146.107.8.88#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:   20.103.107.146.score.senderscore.com
Address: 127.0.4.62

My result is 127.0.4.62. How can i interpret this result?

simple - it's a reputation score
100 = perfect reputation - whitelist score
0 = no reputation, pure spammer

with 62 you make it through postscreen but end with 2.5 points penalty in SA and that you had 2 days ago "senderscore.com LISTED 127.0.4.63" and now got worser scores shows that your outgoing server sends spam (given that we have full reputation 100 there without any actve operation, even before i did know about the RBL/DNSWL)

anything below 127.0.4.70 should raise alerts
_______________________

our postscreen-scoring:
score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[0..20]*2
score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[0..69]*2
score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[90..100]*-1
_______________________

our spamassassin scoring:

header CUST_DNSBL_21 eval:check_rbl('cust21-lastexternal','score.senderscore.com.','^127\.0\.4\.(1?[0-9]|20)$')
describe CUST_DNSBL_21 score.senderscore.com (senderscore.com High)
score    CUST_DNSBL_21 1.5

header CUST_DNSBL_25 eval:check_rbl('cust25-lastexternal','score.senderscore.com.','^127\.0\.4\.(0?[0-6]?[0-9])$')
describe CUST_DNSBL_25 score.senderscore.com (senderscore.com Medium)
score    CUST_DNSBL_25 1.0

header CUST_DNSWL_2 eval:check_rbl('cust35-lastexternal','score.senderscore.com.','^127\.0\.4\.(9[0-9]|100)$')
describe CUST_DNSWL_2 score.senderscore.com (Low Trust)
score    CUST_DNSWL_2 -0.1

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to