Am 19.03.2016 um 15:08 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
Ok. I tried again: pc53200:~ # nslookup 20.103.107.146.score.senderscore.com. Server: 146.107.8.88 Address: 146.107.8.88#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: 20.103.107.146.score.senderscore.com Address: 127.0.4.62 My result is 127.0.4.62. How can i interpret this result?
simple - it's a reputation score 100 = perfect reputation - whitelist score 0 = no reputation, pure spammerwith 62 you make it through postscreen but end with 2.5 points penalty in SA and that you had 2 days ago "senderscore.com LISTED 127.0.4.63" and now got worser scores shows that your outgoing server sends spam (given that we have full reputation 100 there without any actve operation, even before i did know about the RBL/DNSWL)
anything below 127.0.4.70 should raise alerts _______________________ our postscreen-scoring: score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[0..20]*2 score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[0..69]*2 score.senderscore.com=127.0.4.[90..100]*-1 _______________________ our spamassassin scoring:header CUST_DNSBL_21 eval:check_rbl('cust21-lastexternal','score.senderscore.com.','^127\.0\.4\.(1?[0-9]|20)$')
describe CUST_DNSBL_21 score.senderscore.com (senderscore.com High) score CUST_DNSBL_21 1.5header CUST_DNSBL_25 eval:check_rbl('cust25-lastexternal','score.senderscore.com.','^127\.0\.4\.(0?[0-6]?[0-9])$')
describe CUST_DNSBL_25 score.senderscore.com (senderscore.com Medium) score CUST_DNSBL_25 1.0header CUST_DNSWL_2 eval:check_rbl('cust35-lastexternal','score.senderscore.com.','^127\.0\.4\.(9[0-9]|100)$')
describe CUST_DNSWL_2 score.senderscore.com (Low Trust) score CUST_DNSWL_2 -0.1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature