>> >I agree with your opinion in 100%, but in my case I need DBMS with >> >features like subselectes/utf-8/stored procedures but the >> speed is also >> >very important issue. >> >> You might have to spend money! >> >>
>You are saying that there is DBMS with all this features and it is as >fast as MySQL ? >I don't know, but if there is, it is one you will have to >pay for. >In any case, speed is as much a matter of application >design as a DBMS >characteristic. >As a minor side issue, we did some _very limited_ testing >with MS SQLServer >2000 using unicode v ascii queries. Using unicode, queries >tended to run at >about half the speed compare to using ascii. >This was client server, so it is likely that the increased >network traffic >is to blame, but bear it it mind. IPv6 is coming soon and PostgreSQL 7.4 will be the 1st database IPv6-ready! This oportunity give to us the choice to move on to IPv6 network environment. I do believe (tested in my network 6to4 connection) this move can improve the environment performance until 18% in all! Some moves can Checkmate! Robson Oliveira -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
