Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 11:57:07PM +0300, Gadi Evron wrote:
>> Fellow NANOG-ers.
>>
>> I am very happy eith the recent revival of traffic on NANOG on relevant
>> subjects, as I am sure we all are. My email is about traffic we don't
>> see and unless I am missing something, don't know gets filtered. due to
>> what I believe is very heavy-handed moderation by the admin team.
>>
>> First, is this a known issue? If so, please point me to the right clause
>> at the AUP and ignore the rest of my message as misinformed.
>
> Gadi,
>
> If the MLC was really heavy handed they would have booted you for your
> off-topic posts years ago. Personally I still hope they do, I would love
> to be able to resubscribe, but I've seen zero evidence of improvement in
> the content which you've worked so hard to destroy.
>
While I appreciate your feedback, an ad-hominem attack on me and a
generic comment on what some on nanog find operational is muddying the
water for this discussion, which is specific to this particular case.
That is why I accepted what I sent in is off-topic for the sake of this
discussion. Can you reciprocate?
Gadi.
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
