On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Gadi Evron <[email protected]> wrote: > I am very happy eith the recent revival of traffic on NANOG on relevant > subjects, as I am sure we all are. My email is about traffic we don't > see and unless I am missing something, don't know gets filtered. due to > what I believe is very heavy-handed moderation by the admin team. > > First, is this a known issue? If so, please point me to the right clause > at the AUP and ignore the rest of my message as misinformed. > > My concerns are, as I will demonstrate in this message: > > 1. Threads are moderated with no notice to person or mailing > list, or availability for examination. > > 2. There is no apparent over-sight (that I know of) on this > moderation, or visibility. > > 3. It is very heavy-handed high-key moderation, which is not > what we ask for on NANOG as far as I understand, unless there > was a policy change. > > 4. Non of this is covered in the AUP. Not thread moderation, not > the decision process, not how it can be challenged and not > where discarded threads can be examined. > > 5. The admin team does not respond to requests for information > or challenges on this matter (I made one). > > A week ago I sent in a request for comments to NANOG on how ISPs handle > phishing on two fronts. Stopping it from reaching clients, and > experience on notifying clients this is happening. > > The above may or may not be off-topic. I will accept for the purpose of > this discussion that it IS *off-topic*, so that we can concentrate on > moderation procedures and lack of response to members.
do you have a link to this thread? (I don't actually see it in my box, so I fear I missed it for other reasons) -Chris _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
