On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Christopher Morrow
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Gadi Evron <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I am very happy eith the recent revival of traffic on NANOG on relevant
>> subjects, as I am sure we all are. My email is about traffic we don't
>> see and unless I am missing something, don't know gets filtered. due to
>> what I believe is very heavy-handed moderation by the admin team.
>>
>> First, is this a known issue? If so, please point me to the right clause
>> at the AUP and ignore the rest of my message as misinformed.
>>
>> My concerns are, as I will demonstrate in this message:
>>
>>        1. Threads are moderated with no notice to person or mailing
>>           list, or availability for examination.
>>
>>        2. There is no apparent over-sight (that I know of) on this
>>           moderation, or visibility.
>>
>>        3. It is very heavy-handed high-key moderation, which is not
>>           what we ask for on NANOG as far as I understand, unless there
>>           was a policy change.
>>
>>        4. Non of this is covered in the AUP. Not thread moderation, not
>>           the decision process, not how it can be challenged and not
>>           where discarded threads can be examined.
>>
>>        5. The admin team does not respond to requests for information
>>           or challenges on this matter (I made one).
>>
>> A week ago I sent in a request for comments to NANOG on how ISPs handle
>> phishing on two fronts. Stopping it from reaching clients, and
>> experience on notifying clients this is happening.
>>
>> The above may or may not be off-topic. I will accept for the purpose of
>> this discussion that it IS *off-topic*, so that we can concentrate on
>> moderation procedures and lack of response to members.
>
> do you have a link to this thread? (I don't actually see it in my box,
> so I fear I missed it for other reasons)
>

oops, sorry... I did get the original message + ~6 followups. I just
hadn't read them :(

There's not a mention in the thread that things got quashed though...

-Chris

_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

Reply via email to