On 2009-04-06-17:56:02, Gadi Evron <[email protected]> wrote: > While I appreciate your feedback, an ad-hominem attack on me and a > generic comment on what some on nanog find operational is muddying > the water for this discussion, which is specific to this particular > case.
It's not an ad-hominem attack, it's fact. That is to say, in every post of yours, there's an AUP violation or two lurking. Not differences of opinion, but rather, violations as clear as day. I appreciate any attempts at "heavy-handed" moderation, as it means I won't need to self-moderate as much with the 'd' key. Sorry, -a _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
