So, in the distant past we (there are several we's in this case) experimentally deployed IDSes and or inline sniffers with the permission of merit staff under the requirement that all the data collected be destroyed when the meeting was over. Some of these experiments resulted in the announcement of results, some were simply to get an understanding of dense wireless network deployments, deal with rogue systems, or evaluate the technology.
Like I said, I could see alternatives and circumstances were other approaches would be appropriate, But I would probably not avail myself of an experiment where the result to be for example a published set of flow data or catch-all packet traces from the meeting. joel Martin Hannigan wrote: > Its pretty easy to assign a Creative Commons license to the work and > share it, for example. What could the possible objections be? > > Best, > > Marty > > On 4/9/09, Joel Jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Martin Hannigan wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joe Provo <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks for the feedback - please do keep it coming! We'll pop out >>> an updated draft to reflect the concensus when some equilibrium is >>> reached, but just to comment on some of the questions and points >>> raised so far (both on-list and off): >>> >>> >>> - Costs were intended to be covered under the "Have finite and >>> well-defined requirements for support [...]" (WRT static/sunk >>> costs of labour, etc) and "a statement regarding resources the >>> proposer is committing to supply" (WRT money or specific equipment >>> needed for the experiment). The draft will be updated to make >>> both more explict. >>> - >>> >>> >>> >>> It would be interesting to suggest that a copy of all raw data collected >>> to be provided back to the community so that they too could share in the >>> research or create derivatives from it (with proper attribution for all >>> work product of course). >> As a goal that's exactly the opposite of how we've done it in the past. >> not sure that it's necessarily a bad idea, just saying. >> >>> Best, >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Hannigan [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> p: +16178216079 >>> Power, Network, and Costs Consulting for Iceland Datacenters and Occupants >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nanog-futures mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures > > _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
