On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:13:11 PDT, kevin graham said: > Given the bellowing over some of the allocations in 24/8 that have been > heard here before, it would seem to be welcome. Sticking large numbers > of unadministered, always-on boxes that aren't supposed to be running > inbound services in unrouted space would save all of us headaches.
That's almost a better justification for NAT than address-space conservation. ;)
msg01291/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature