On 4/21/2010 8:46 AM, Jim Burwell wrote:
Despite it doing the job it was intended to do, I've always seen NAT as a bit of an ugly hack, with potential to get even uglier with LSN and multi-level NAT in the future. I personally welcome a return to a NAT-less world with IPv6. :)
Don't you get all of the same problems when there is a properly restrictive SPI firewall at both ends of the connection regardless of weather NAT is used as well.
