No. You get a different set of problems, mostly administrative.
On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Dave Sparro wrote: > On 4/21/2010 8:46 AM, Jim Burwell wrote: >> >> Despite it doing the job it was intended to do, I've always seen NAT >> as a bit of an ugly hack, with potential to get even uglier with LSN >> and multi-level NAT in the future. I personally welcome a return to a >> NAT-less world with IPv6. :) >> > > Don't you get all of the same problems when there is a properly restrictive > SPI firewall at both ends of the connection regardless of weather NAT is used > as well. > James R. Cutler james.cut...@consultant.com
