> Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's perhaps why we're still > stuck with the GPL license :-)
I am pretty sure the copyright holder can do whatever they want, so long as they aren't bound to the gpl by other source code or libraries in the application. NAnt may be bound to the gpl because of things like the sharpcvslib. There's also the issue of source code that may have been copied. Does anybody know where all the source comes from? > > I did have a quick look at the licensing stuff, and to me it seems like a > BSD-style license is the most open license ... I would summarize it as "do want you want with this code, and you can't sue me" with an unwritten correlary of "I don't want your crummy enhancements to my code". It is definately my preference to use BSD or Apache licenses. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
