Ian MacLean wrote:
The category could also be implemented using a tag in the xml comments. The advantage with using an attribute property is that you can get the compiler to force the property to be set. Not too bothered either way.
Ian
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
The next thing I'll look at is namespace support which would be somthing
like :
[CustomFunctionSet(NameSpaceUri="somenamespace", prefix="foo" )]
I suggest, that we included something like a category/description which would be used to generate the documentation.
[CustomFunctionSet(NameSpaceUri="somenamespace", Prefix="", Category="String Functions")]
[CustomFunctionSet(NameSpaceUri="somenamespace", Prefix="date", Category="Date/Time Functions")]
We could generate the "Function Index" page where functions would be groupped by Category.
We'd have:
String Functions:
length | description for length() substring | description for substring() startswith | description for length()
Date/Time Functions:
now | description for now()
and so on... What do you think?
Jarek
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
