Can you add the category stuff or should I do it?

We need:

- a new property 'Category' for 'CustomFunctionSetAttribute'
- changes to the function index to split functions by category
- maybe we should place this information on each function's reference page

Jarek
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jaroslaw Kowalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Naming of documentation files


> Good work on the userdoc stuff for functions Jarek. I just built after
> syncing your checkins. It looks great - we just need to fill those doc
> comments in now. I can see that  a category is needed though - that
> index page is looking pretty crowede already.
>
> Ian MacLean wrote:
>
> > The category could also be implemented using a tag in the xml
> > comments. The advantage with using an attribute property is that you
> > can get the compiler to force the property to be set. Not too bothered
> > either way.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
> >
> >>> The next thing I'll look at is namespace support which would be
> >>> somthing
> >>> like :
> >>>
> >>> [CustomFunctionSet(NameSpaceUri="somenamespace", prefix="foo" )]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> I suggest, that we included something like a category/description which
> >> would be used to generate
> >> the documentation.
> >>
> >> [CustomFunctionSet(NameSpaceUri="somenamespace",
> >>    Prefix="",
> >>    Category="String Functions")]
> >>
> >> [CustomFunctionSet(NameSpaceUri="somenamespace",
> >>    Prefix="date",
> >>    Category="Date/Time Functions")]
> >>
> >> We could generate the "Function Index" page where functions would be
> >> groupped by Category.
> >>
> >> We'd have:
> >>
> >> String Functions:
> >>
> >>    length | description for length()
> >>    substring | description for substring()
> >>    startswith | description for length()
> >>
> >> Date/Time Functions:
> >>
> >>    now | description for now()
> >>
> >> and so on... What do you think?
> >>
> >> Jarek
> >>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> nant-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Reply via email to