On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:14:14PM +0100, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > For us: bottom line is: we will stay with ns_malloc as-is as the > speed penalty vs. malloc on Solaris/Mac 1cpu is not worth the > effort.
If anyone is really interested in this, the best thing to do would be to try various more sophisticated high-performance multi-threaded malloc replacements, rather than just ns_malloc. This was discussed a bit on the AOLserver list a year or three ago, if anyone cares to search. -- Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.piskorski.com/
