On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:28:17PM +0000, Neophytos Demetriou wrote: > Andrew Piskorski wrote: > >If anyone is really interested in this, the best thing to do would be > >to try various more sophisticated high-performance multi-threaded > >malloc replacements, rather than just ns_malloc. This was discussed a > >bit on the AOLserver list a year or three ago, if anyone cares to > >search. > > Here's the message I had in mind: > http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1027255.html
Google's TCMalloc thing is also relevent, but it's not the malloc replacement I was thinking of. Ah yes, I was thinking of "Hoard": http://www.hoard.org/ http://www.cs.umass.edu/~emery/hoard/ http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?config=aolserver_listserv_aol_com&restrict=&exclude=&words=hoard -- Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.piskorski.com/
