On Mon, Oct 15, 2007, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: > On 15.10.2007, at 20:37, Stephen Deasey wrote:
>> 2: This scheme would nicely handle non performance critical key/value >> config called from Tcl code. But if you can already do that with >> nsv...? > > Well, not really. This needs to be also accessible from C and from > various plugin-modules. Making nsv usable from C code is very useful, and not all that hard. I've done it in the past (for AOLserver 3.x and 4.0.x). So, just how are the use cases for dynamic ns_config different from those for nsv? Since the existig ns_config is totally static, it's safe to take the pointer returned by Ns_ConfigGetValue() and just assume it never changes and is always valid process-wide. But of course that can't work when calling Nsv from C code. What does your dynamic ns_config code do for that case? -- Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.piskorski.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
