Hi, On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Chris Hegarty <[email protected]> wrote: > What Pavel is trying to do with onClose is to adhere to the > spirit of the RFC, rather than supporting open-ended half-close semantics.
Not sure there is a spirit to RFCs, just interpretations. I doubt the "spirit" of the RFC was to deny completely the send of messages in half closed state. If it was so, it would have probably been stated so clearly. Web*Socket* was born as a thin layer on top of sockets, so TCP, that is why I keep referring to that. I'm fine that mine interpretation is different from Pavel's, we're just discussing different interpretations here and try to come out with a good/common one. -- Simone Bordet http://bordet.blogspot.com --- Finally, no matter how good the architecture and design are, to deliver bug-free software with optimal performance and reliability, the implementation technique must be flawless. Victoria Livschitz
