>>>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:56:58 -0500, "Hal Rosenstock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said:
HR> We've got it "down" to slightly under 400K mainly by following that HR> but that's still too large :-( I doubt you'll be able to make massive jumps beyond that. You may be able to shave off another 100k or so by diving into code-removal in the libraries and agent but I'm not even positive about that. >> In short, though, there is a bunch of code in the snmplib library that >> isn't really needed by the agent. HR> Is this the first place to analyze ? Probably >> And there is a bunch in the agent that could be "optional". HR> More configuration options for these ? No, but that's what I'd do if I started analyzing the code for potential "optional features" that could be removed: remove them via ifdefs and add new options to configure. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
