Thank you very much for the last reply. I haven't mentioned that before because the mail was written a bit too fast but I appreciated that and I'm here expressing my gratitude now.
I look forward to hearing from you. Best Regards / Cumprimentos, Sérgio Cabaço -----Original Message----- From: Sergio Cabaço [mailto:sergio.cab...@edisoft.pt] Sent: terça-feira, 24 de Março de 2009 16:58 To: Dave Shield Cc: net-snmp-cod...@lists.sourceforge.net; net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: Multi-destiny Traps > No - it will use the "getopt()" library call - not the command-line binary. Ok, that's it, it uses the system library. Nevertheless it uses something available by the system and not by net-snmp, my mistake. > What O/S is this "unix-based system"? It is a sub-module (uses the kernel with some modifications) of LynxOS (not all POSIX specifications) and it hasn't getopt available in the system. > What does "man getopt" report? Nothing, it has not man available. It is a very delicate OS :) I have encountered net-snmp-config.h that is generated by configure. In this file, HAVE_GETOPT_H is defined with value 1. I think if I could put it to 0 in configure, this would work just fine. Maybe, when putted into 0, this will make no difference but I would like to try it. Best Regards / Cumprimentos, Sérgio Cabaço -----Original Message----- From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Dave Shield Sent: terça-feira, 24 de Março de 2009 16:32 To: Sergio Cabaço Cc: net-snmp-cod...@lists.sourceforge.net; net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Multi-destiny Traps 2009/3/24 Sergio Cabaço <sergio.cab...@edisoft.pt>: > I realised that in linux the net-snmp uses /usr/bin/getopt function in > snmp_parse_args.c No - it will use the "getopt()" library call - not the command-line binary. > and in the unix based system that function doesn't exists on the system. What O/S is this "unix-based system"? What does "man getopt" report? (Forget about whether there's a getopt command or not - that's not relevant here). Frankly, I would be amazed if it didn't include a getopt() call. It's part of the POSIX specification, so it would be a very very odd Unix that omitted it. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list net-snmp-cod...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users