on 7/19/00 11:37 AM, Ryan McBeth at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The other big questions is if Netatalk is fast becoming > irrelevant. So far, nobody has yet to give me a straight answer on > if Mac OSX can connect to linux / Unix machines via NFS. I highly doubt that, since, even if Mac OS/X is released on time, it will be a while before it is both usable and stable enough to replace current ASIP installations. While Mac OS/X Server (a currently shipping pseudo-product) does appear to do a good job at IP connectivity, I don't have any relevant benchmarks in regards to performance. Why would Mac OS/X not be able to connect via NFS - it's BSD based, so it should have all the relevant nfs clients built-in. How would that affect the usability or existence of netatalk? Harry
- Re: Penguin Fun... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: netatalk comps (and alt... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- unsubscribe Richard Crane
- NT vs. netatalk and $$ (was... Marc J. Miller
- Re: NFS Under OS X (was Re: pre... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: NFS Under OS X (was Re... andrew morgan
- Re: NFS Under OS X (was Re:... wesley . craig
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Matthew Geier
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- OS X obsoleting Netatalk? was: pre-asun2.1.4... Hauke Fath
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 andrew morgan
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Stephen Welker
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 andrew morgan
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 J�rgen Weltzer
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Stephen Welker
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Stephen Welker
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 J�rgen Weltzer
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Sak Wathanasin
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Russell Harmon
