on 7/19/00 3:54 PM, Ryan McBeth at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Then I guess we have to decide if it is worth it. Is it worth the > time or trouble to work on a protocol that may not be used in a year or > two? Of course, there are plenty of schools that will still be using OS > 8x and OS 9x. a) you just answered your own question - as many older Macs will still need afp to access a file server. b) netatalk is not just afp, but also (thanks to Adrian) the IP component, which I find to be equally, if not more important - and I highly doubt that IP connectivity will be obsolete any time real soon - even if Apple phases out afp. Harry
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Ray Zimmerman
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Ryan McBeth
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 J�rgen Weltzer
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Ryan McBeth
- Re: pre-asun2.1.4-39 Jens Brambring
- NFS Under OS X (was Re: pre-asun2.1... JAReD
- Re: NFS Under OS X (was Re: pre... Aaron Faby
- Re: NFS Under OS X (was Re... Ryan McBeth
- Re: NFS Under OS X (wa... Chris G. Sellers
- Re: NFS Under OS X (wa... Aaron Faby
- Re: NFS Under OS X (wa... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: NFS Under OS X (was Re: pre... J�rgen Weltzer
- Re: NFS Under OS X (was Re... Howard Schultens
- Re: NFS Under OS X (wa... J�rgen Weltzer
- Re: NFS Under OS X (wa... andrew morgan
- Re: NFS Under OS X (wa... J�rgen Weltzer
- Re: NFS Under OS X (wa... Aaron Levitt
- RE: NFS Under OS X (wa... Jonathan Newman
- Re: NFS Under OS X (wa... J�rgen Weltzer
- Re: NFS Under OS X (wa... Ray Zimmerman
- Re: NFS Under OS X (wa... Welle
