On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: andrew morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Harry Zink/Netatalk List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > There have been some discussions about a future home for netatalk at
> > SourceForge or Suse (UMich people, can you comment further on this?).
> > I could start the SourceForge site, but I'm not very familiar with
> > their services and I have no experience with CVS.
>
> I haven't heard anything from the suse people in a while. As you
> stated, netatalk is in need of some 1) release engineering and 2) bug
> fixes. Both the asun and umich sources have been available a long time
> -- the availability of the umich source is what allowed asun to make
> changes available.
>
> It doesn't seem like creating a netatalk SourceForge site will add
> AppleTalk/Unix engineers. If suse wants to contribute engineers, that
> would be helpful. If any one else wants to contribute his or her
> talent, the netatalk community will respond as we have all witnessed on
> this list.
But it *would* provide a CVS repository. Having one central person that all
patches have to go through is a pain when working with distributed
development. It's much easier being able to use CVS. Sourceforge also hosts
bug tracking and all sorts of other resources -- it would be nice to have
those for netatalk.
*************************
jeff b
system administrator
university communications
university of connecticut
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
