On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Ryan McBeth wrote:
> >
> >But it *would* provide a CVS repository. Having one central person that all
> >patches have to go through is a pain when working with distributed
> >development. It's much easier being able to use CVS. Sourceforge also hosts
> >bug tracking and all sorts of other resources -- it would be nice to have
> >those for netatalk.
> >
>
> I just e-mailed Wesley Craig @ UMich . I think I just volunteered to
> to be that very person! Unless there is someone out there who wants
> to do it instead.
Flip a coin. I was just about to start a sourceforge site myself, but if
you have *any* experience with sourceforge or CVS, you'd be more qualified
than I. So who will it be?
Andy
- Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re: NFS Under OS X (... jeff b
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re: NFS Und... Ryan McBeth
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re: NFS... Radar O'Reilly
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re:... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re:... Ryan McBeth
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re:... Marc J. Miller
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re: NFS... andrew morgan
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re: NFS... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- RE: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re:... Jonathan Newman
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re:... J�rgen Weltzer
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re:... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (wa... bryan stalcup
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: Sourceforge and... Marcus Radich
- Re: Sourceforge and... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: Sourceforge and... Marcus Radich
- Re: Sourceforge and... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
