on 7/24/00 8:59 AM, Ryan McBeth at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What we really need to do is get netatalk.org up and running Well, that depends on who owns the netatalk.org domain, and who has done nothing with it - not even a redirect. > and > start contacting Redhat, Debian, and Caldera. Get them to start > including Netatalk into their distros. Getting inclusion in one of the major distros will be a good first step - question - what version should that be? pre37 or pre39? Can anyone fix the disabled charset thingy in those first, and then create a ready-to-use RPM? The problem really is that the only existing netatalk RPM is hopelessly outdated so far. Harry
- Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re: NFS Under OS X (... jeff b
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re: NFS Und... Ryan McBeth
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re: NFS... Radar O'Reilly
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re:... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re:... Ryan McBeth
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re:... Marc J. Miller
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re: NFS... andrew morgan
- RE: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re: NFS... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- RE: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re:... Jonathan Newman
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re: Re:... J�rgen Weltzer
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (was Re:... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS (wa... bryan stalcup
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: Sourceforge and... Marcus Radich
- Re: Sourceforge and... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: Sourceforge and... Marcus Radich
- Re: Sourceforge and... Harry Zink/Netatalk List
- Re: Sourceforge and CVS... J�rgen Weltzer
