I see no contradiction between painting and being digital. The art just has
to involve discrete systems in some manner. There is nothing in the rule
book that says it has to involve a computer. Mez¹s work is digital but can
be done with pencil and paper. Also, painting no longer has to involve
paint. Warhol¹s piss and rust metal plates were just that, metal plates he
pissed on and left to rust. They were then presented as effectively
paintings. To really mix things up Cohen¹s paintings made with Aaron are
both paintings (made with paint) and computer art (made by computer). These
days it pays not to be anal about definitions. There will always be an
exception that shows you are wrong.

Best

Simon


Simon Biggs

s.bi...@eca.ac.uk  si...@littlepig.org.uk  Skype: simonbiggsuk
http://www.littlepig.org.uk/
Research Professor  edinburgh college of art  http://www.eca.ac.uk/
Creative Interdisciplinary Research into CoLlaborative Environments
http://www.eca.ac.uk/circle/
Electronic Literature as a Model of Creativity and Innovation in Practice
http://www.elmcip.net/



From: martin mitchell <martinmitc...@mac.com>
Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
<netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:52:56 +0000
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
<netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org>
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] A statement

Hello.

Please separate the idea of painting from the creation of digital images
it's a contradiction and makes it difficult for people to understand what
digital artists are creating...........

Martin Mitchell.

Crispy Nails Animation Studio.

http://www.crispynails.co.uk/
 <http://www.crispynails.co.uk/>
On 15 Mar 2010, at 15:41, Yann Le Guennec wrote:

> My work is about the evolution of painting in a networked environment,
> both physical and digital, present and distant, in time and space. I
> make what i call "variable paintings". They address classical themes
> such as Landscape or Still life. These paintings are not paintings in
> the sense of concrete objects, but digital pictures produced online by
> networked devices. This approach does not exclude the possibility of
> making physical objects from digital pictures, but the composition of
> these pictures is made online and should primarily be seen online, for
> example projected in an exhibition space connected to the internet. All
> devices are built on almost the same model. Visual sensors (eg:
> photography, stills from video) are taking pictures in an environment,
> these pictures are transformed by online softwares and then shown to the
> spectator. Variations in this main model allow each device to address
> more specific problematics in the field of "networked painting".
> 
> http://www.yannleguennec.com/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour



_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


Edinburgh College of Art (eca) is a charity registered in Scotland, number 
SC009201


_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to