Andy Bierman <a...@yumaworks.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:19:45AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > Conformance to YANG for the extension: NONE This includes syntax and > > > semantics. It makes no sense at all (Lada is right) to say the > > > extension semantics apply. They only apply if the tool supports the > > > extension. Conformance to the extension is a different matter. > > > > I would hope that a server supporting NACM implements the behaviour of > > nacm:default-deny-write when nodes are tagged with this extension. > > Sure, a YANG parser is allowed to skip over nacm:default-deny-write > > but if nacm:default-deny-write is used for a certain node, I think we > > want the server to implement the semantics implied by > > nacm:default-deny-write regardless which tool the developer used. > > > > > I do not agree. > The semantics for this YANG extension only apply to NACM. > Of course an implementation of NACM cannot ignore this extension.
+1 So the question is if we need to add/change any text in 6020bis? /martin > > The extensions says what to do in NACM if the tag is found. > (As it should). It does not define any behavior outside of NACM. > No other tool except a NETCONF server implementation > of NACM has any conformance requirement to implement this extension. > > > /js > > > > > Andy > > > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
