I personally don’t see anything that prevents this.
—Tom
> On Dec 13, 2015:6:56 AM, at 6:56 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> <droma...@avaya.com> wrote:
>
> Concerning the 'draft status' - anything prevents the wg from running a short
> consensus call and adding this item to the netmod milestones?
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nadeau
>> Thomas
>> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 4:27 PM
>> To: William Lupton
>> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG
>> module
>>
>>
>> Dependance on 1.1 should not be an issue as that is almost ready to
>> be approved. You should be building your model to comply with the 1.1 rules.
>>
>> —Tom
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 11, 2015:8:00 AM, at 8:00 AM, William Lupton
>> <wlup...@broadband-forum.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> The Broadband Forum would like to use the ietf-entity YANG module
>> (currently draft-entitydt-netmod-entity) for equipment management but we
>> are a bit concerned about its draft status and its dependence on YANG 1.1.
>> Any advice or reassurance?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> William
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
