I personally don’t see anything that prevents this.
Same opinion here.
Regards, Benoit
—Tom
On Dec 13, 2015:6:56 AM, at 6:56 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <droma...@avaya.com>
wrote:
Concerning the 'draft status' - anything prevents the wg from running a short
consensus call and adding this item to the netmod milestones?
Regards,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nadeau
Thomas
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 4:27 PM
To: William Lupton
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG
module
Dependance on 1.1 should not be an issue as that is almost ready to
be approved. You should be building your model to comply with the 1.1 rules.
—Tom
On Dec 11, 2015:8:00 AM, at 8:00 AM, William Lupton
<wlup...@broadband-forum.org> wrote:
All,
The Broadband Forum would like to use the ietf-entity YANG module
(currently draft-entitydt-netmod-entity) for equipment management but we
are a bit concerned about its draft status and its dependence on YANG 1.1.
Any advice or reassurance?
Thanks,
William
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
