As you know, after much discussion, the Co-chairs declared these
requirements to be in scope and
having consensus to proceed forward at one of the recent interim meetings, and
on the mailing list to confirm.
—Tom
> On Dec 16, 2015:7:21 PM, at 7:21 PM, Andy Bierman <a...@yumaworks.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have asked repeatedly for some indication of scope in these requirements.
> There is an assumption all possible YANG-based platforms have intended
> and applied state that can be different for a long enough interval such that
> retrieving
> the differences is operationally useful.
>
> For devices that converge in milli-seconds or even as long as 5 seconds,
> I do not see the point of implementing solutions for these requirements.
> I would prefer that this draft specify some sort of objective
> metric for determining the solution applicability.
>
>
> Andy
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Nadeau Thomas <tnad...@lucidvision.com
> <mailto:tnad...@lucidvision.com>> wrote:
>
> This is a WG Last Call on draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs-01.
> Please post comments on this draft by Wednesday, December 30, 2015
> at 9AM EST.
>
> Tom/Kent
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
