On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 04:28:18PM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > My interpretation: > > Option 2 is to disallow tabs in the output, but leave it to the > implementation to decide how to handle tabs in the input document, so a > script would be allowed to do a, b, or c. > > Just supporting "option 2(a)" is the same as "option 1": > > 1) RFC disallows TABS in both the source-input and folded-output. > ***This is what we currently have*** > > Perhaps you mean that you prefer option 1? >
1) or 2a) since 2b) and 2c) are not implementable in tools that are detached from the author and his/her editor and they will ultimately require to carry some metadata around and this means additional complexity for no real gain since the output has no TABs anyway. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod