Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 04:28:18PM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote: > > My interpretation: > > > > Option 2 is to disallow tabs in the output, but leave it to the > > implementation to decide how to handle tabs in the input document, so a > > script would be allowed to do a, b, or c. > > > > Just supporting "option 2(a)" is the same as "option 1": > > > > 1) RFC disallows TABS in both the source-input and folded-output. > > ***This is what we currently have*** > > > > Perhaps you mean that you prefer option 1? > > > > 1) or 2a) since 2b) and 2c) are not implementable in tools that are > detached from the author and his/her editor and they will ultimately > require to carry some metadata around and this means additional > complexity for no real gain since the output has no TABs anyway.
I agree. I prefer option 1. If you do have tabs in your input, simply translate them before running the folding algorithm. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
